Validating schema saml response

Note: Due to the nature of cryptographic security, non-intrusive testing may not be possible.The Profile makes strong requirements (e.g., MUST, MUST NOT) wherever feasible; if there are legitimate cases where such a requirement cannot be met, conditional requirements (e.g., MAY, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT) are used.When the Basic Security Profile 1.0 cannot address an issue in a specification it references, this information is communicated to the appropriate body to assure its consideration.Backwards compatibility with deployed Web services is not a goal for the Basic Security Profile 1.0, but due consideration is given to it; the Profile does not introduce a change to the requirements of a referenced specification unless doing so addresses specific interoperability issues.Where possible, the Basic Security Profile 1.0 places requirements on artifacts (e.g., WSDL descriptions, SOAP messages) rather than the producing or consuming software's behaviors or roles.Artifacts are concrete, making them easier to verify and therefore making conformance easier to understand and less error-prone.You represent and warrant that you have rights to provide this Feedback, and if you are providing Feedback on behalf of a company, you represent and warrant that you have the rights to provide Feedback on behalf of your company.You also acknowledge that WS-I is not required to review, discuss, use, consider or in any way incorporate your Feedback into future versions of its work.

When amplifying the requirements of referenced specifications (including the Basic Profile 1.0), the Basic Security Profile 1.0 may restrict them, but does not relax them (e.g., change a MUST to a MAY).Feedback on this document should be directed to [email protected] document defines the WS-I Basic Security Profile 1.0 (hereafter, "Profile"), consisting of a set of non-proprietary Web services specifications, along with clarifications to and amplifications of those specifications which promote interoperability.If WS-I does incorporate some or all of your Feedback in a future version of the work, it may, but is not obligated to include your name (or, if you are identified as acting on behalf of your company, the name of your company) on a list of contributors to the work.If the foregoing is not acceptable to you and any company on whose behalf you are acting, please do not provide any Feedback.

Search for validating schema saml response:

validating schema saml response-89

The profile takes steps to avoid introducing new security threats.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “validating schema saml response”